Property protection, Types of alarm technology, Battery operated smoke alarms - grade f – Aico Residential Fire Detection RFD User Manual

Page 10

Advertising
background image

10

People with impaired mobility require

more time to escape. They need the

earliest possible warning of a fire and

greater alarm coverage. The hearing

impaired also have very particular

needs, and these are dealt with later in

this document.

It is obvious to any landlord - in the

public or private sector - that those

judged to be most at risk and in need

of a high level of protection are those

who form a typical cross section of

their tenants.

PROPERTY PROTECTION

BS 5839: Pt.6 also adds other

considerations for the protection of

property. However, it stresses that only in

exceptional circumstances, for example

in a house of historical importance

where no-one sleeps, should the

principle objective of a fire detection

system ever be the preservation of

property rather than lives.

If property damage is the decisive

factor, the Code recommends

installing a system which results in the

fire brigade being called early enough

to limit property damage.

As a fire that starts anywhere will cause

damage, consideration should be given

to providing detectors in some or all

rooms of the building. Coverage in

circulation areas alone is unlikely to be

adequate. Once again, areas with a

statistically greater fire risk, such as

kitchens and boiler rooms, where likely

sources of ignition are present, should

have priority for detectors.

Property damage should, of course,

never be a deciding factor for a

landlord, but it is worth bearing in mind

not only the human cost but also the

financial cost of a fire breaking out in

a property. Insurance premiums may

rise, renovation costs may be

expensive and revenue from the

property will be lost while it is being

made habitable, to say nothing of the

cost of re-housing tenants. Once

again, the cost-effectiveness of a

quality fire alarm system offering the

earliest possible warning is self-evident.

TYPES OF ALARM

TECHNOLOGY

The next issue raised by the Code is

the types of alarm available.

BATTERY OPERATED

SMOKE ALARMS - GRADE F

BS 5839: Pt.6 acknowledges the

advantages of the single, battery

operated smoke alarm. They’re

simple to install and offer protection

at very low cost. Battery operated

smoke alarms conforming to BS

5446: Pt.1 are recommended.

However, these alarms do have

serious drawbacks. Occupants on

a tight budget may not be able to

afford to replace the batteries. A

significant number of tenants have

also been shown to remove the

batteries to prevent false alarms or

to use in other battery powered

devices and then forget to replace

them. For this reason, the Code

recommends that these alarms

should not be used to protect

tenants in properties of more than

one storey – and even then the

batteries should be sealed-in and

have a life in excess of 5 years.

As an aside, landlords have now

been found liable in cases where

tenants themselves have disabled

an alarm. For this reason, it is

unlikely that landlords will be able

to trust tenants to adequately look

after the alarms. The Code

highlights the fact that battery

powered alarms are only suitable

for owner-occupied properties if

the likelihood is that batteries will

be replaced within five days of a

low battery signal.

Interestingly, the Code acknowledges

that people on a low income are

more at risk than other groups, which

is borne out by statistics from the

British Crime Survey. They may not be

able to afford to replace batteries in

smoke alarms and the Code

consequently points out that ‘a more

reliable power supply for the fire

detection and alarm system is

essential’. This worry, coupled with the

fear of alarms being cut off to poorer

residents along with their electricity

supply, permeates the entire

document and needs to be stressed.

People living in a house in multiple

occupation are between eight and

ten times more likely to die in a fire

than those in single family homes, it

has been estimated. However, the

Code distinguishes between

properties commonly designated as

HMOs. On the one hand, a family

living with a lodger might not be

classed as an HMO as the fire risk may

be no greater than a normal dwelling.

It identifies the greatest risk in houses

converted into bedsits and to elderly

people in sheltered accommodation.

Generally, the risk is also greater if the

property exceeds two storeys in

height. Here the Code recommends

“where the risk in an HMO is relatively

high, it is essential that there is

protection by a highly reliable fire

detection and fire alarm system. It is

also essential that a warning is given

in the event of a fault that impairs the

standard of protection”.

Advertising