Sil declaration of conformity, Supplement, 52 vegapuls 54k enamel – VEGA VEGAPULS 54K enamel User Manual

Page 52

Advertising
background image

52

VEGAPULS 54K enamel

24 101-EN-041227

SIL declaration of conformity

Supplement




Füllstand - Grenzstand - Druck

S I L d e c l a r a t i o n of c o n f o r m i t y

Functional safety according to IEC 61508 / IEC 61511


VEGA Grieshaber KG, Am Hohenstein 113, D-77761 Schiltach

declares as manufacturer, that for the radar sensors of the product families

VEGAPULS series 40 and 50

( 4 ... 20 mA HART® )

the reliability (“proven in use”) was verified according to IEC 61508 / IEC 61511.

Therefore the devices are suitable for safety-related applications

e.g. overfill protection, dry run protection or recording of an arbitrary fill level.

The corresponding instructions of the safety manual must be considered.

1)

Safety related characteristics:

VEGAPULS 40

VEGAPULS 50

SIL

Safety Integrity Level

SIL 2

SIL 2

HFT

Hardware Fault Tolerance

2)

0

0

SFF

Safe Failure Fraction

> 88 %

> 86 %

< 0,10 x 10

-2

< 0,12 x 10

-2

T

Proof

1 year

PFD

avg

average Probability of dangerous

Failure on Demand

3)

(for low demand mode)

< 0,50 x 10

-2

< 0,60 x 10

-2

T

Proof

5 years

PFH

Probability of a dangerous Failure per
Hour

4)

[1/h]

(for high demand or continuous mode)

< 0,22 x 10

-6

< 0,28 x 10

-6

Error response time

60sec



The failure rates were determined by a FMEDA ( Failure Modes, Effects and Diagnostics Analysis )

VEGAPULS 40

VEGAPULS 50

λ

sd

safe detected failure

107 FIT

111 FIT

5)

λ

su

safe undetected failure

494

FIT

518

FIT

λ

dd

dangerous detected failure

1090

FIT

1140

FIT

λ

du

dangerous undetected failure

221

FIT

277

FIT

MTTF

Mean Time To Failure

60 years

56 years

MTTR = 8h

1)

Safety Manual see supplement of the operating instructions

2)

HFT is reduced by one according to IEC 61511-1, section 11.4.4

3)

PFD

avg

is valid only for the T

Proof

interval according to which a recurring function test must be carried out

4)

PFH is constant over the time. According to the standard, a recurring function test is not necessary.

The failure tolerance time of the overall system must be higher than the error response time of the sensor.

5)

FIT = failure in time [10

-9

h]



The assessment of the modification management was part of the proof for

reliability (“proven in use”).



Schiltach, 28.10.03
VEGA Grieshaber KG




i.V.

Frühauf

i.A.

Blessing

Head of Certification department

Commissioner for functional safety

SIL-KE_PULS40+50_EN_031028

Advertising