Panasonic GU87 - Manual (Page 103)

Appendix C: Consumer Update 99
cancer is greater among people who use mobile phones than among the rest of the population.
One way to answer that question is to compare the usage of mobile phones among people with
brain cancer with the use of mobile phones among appropriately matched people without brain
cancer. This is called a case-control study. The current case-control study of brain cancers by the
National Cancer Institute, as well as the follow-up research to be sponsored by industry, will begin
to generate this type of information.
What is FDA’s role concerning the safety of mobile phones?
Under the law, FDA does not review the safety of radiation-emitting consumer products such as
mobile phones before marketing, as it does with new drugs or medical devices. However, the
agency has authority to take action if mobile phones are shown to emit radiation at a level that is
hazardous to the user. In such a case, FDA could require the manufacturers of mobile phones to
notify users of the health hazard and to repair, replace or recall the phones so that the hazard no
longer exists.
Although the existing scientific data do not justify FDA regulatory actions at this time, FDA has
urged the mobile phone industry to take a number of steps to assure public safety. The agency has
recommended that the industry:
•
support needed research into possible biological effects of RF of the type emitted by mobile
phones;
• design mobile phones in a way that minimizes any RF exposure to the user that is not
necessary for device function; and
• cooperate in providing mobile phone users with the best possible information on what is known
about possible effects of mobile phone use on human health.
At the same time, FDA belongs to an interagency working group of the federal agencies that have
responsibility for different aspects of mobile phone safety to ensure a coordinated effort at the
federal level. These agencies are:
•
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
• Environmental Protection Agency
• Federal Communications Commission
• Occupational Health and Safety Administration
• National Telecommunications and Information Administration
The National Institutes of Health also participates in this group.
In the absence of conclusive information about any possible risk, what can concerned
individuals do?
If there is a risk from these products — and at this point we do not know that there is — it is
probably very small. But if people are concerned about avoiding even potential risks, there are
simple steps they can take to do so. For example, time is a key factor in how much exposure a
person receives. Those persons who spend long periods of time on their hand-held mobile phones
could consider holding lengthy conversations on conventional phones and reserving the hand-held
models for shorter conversations or for situations when other types of phones are not available.
People who must conduct extended conversations in their cars every day could switch to a type of
mobile phone that places more distance between their bodies and the source of the RF, since the
exposure level drops off dramatically with distance. For example, they could switch to
•
a mobile phone in which the antenna is located outside the vehicle,
• a hand-held phone with a built-in antenna connected to a different antenna mounted on the
outside of the car or built into a separate package, or
• a headset with a remote antenna to a mobile phone carried at the waist.
Again, the scientific data do not demonstrate that mobile phones are harmful. But if people are
concerned about the radiofrequency energy from these products, taking the simple precautions
outlined above can reduce any possible risk.
GU87 OI.book Page 99 Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:05 PM