Limitations, Quality control – Leica Biosystems HER2 FISH System - 30 Test User Manual

Page 13

Advertising
background image

Page 13 of 24

English

Leica Biosystems Leica HER2 FISH System - 30 Test Instructions for Use TA9217 EN-CE-Rev_D 08/04/2013

English

Quality Control

Use of Control Slides

It is recommended that a Leica HER2 FISH Control Slide is included in each test run to monitor

assay performance and to assess the accuracy of signal enumeration. Control slides should be

run for each staining batch on the Leica BOND-MAX and BOND-III System and with each new

reagent lot. In addition, individual users may choose to use their own control material.
Assess control slide quality and perform signal enumeration according to the instructions in the

Signal Assessment and Enumeration section. The criteria for slide quality must be satisfied

and the HER2:CEP17 ratio results should be within the established ranges for acceptable test

performance. See Table 3 for acceptance criteria of the Leica HER2 FISH Control Slides.

Cell Line

Bond Oracle
HER2 IHC
System Profile

HER2
Receptor Load
per cell*

Leica HER2 FISH System - 30 Test
HER2:CEP17 Acceptance Criteria

SKBr-3

3+

4.3 x 10

5

HER2 amplification is observed

MDA-MB-453

2+

1.4 x 10

5

HER2/CEP17 gene ratio should be between
1.5 – 2.5

MDA-MB-175

1+

6.3 x 10

4

HER2 amplification is not observed

MDA-MB-231

0

9.3 x 10

3

HER2 amplification is not observed

*HER2 receptor load analysis as assessed by flow cytometry
Table 3: Leica HER2 FISH Control Slide Interpretation.

If assay controls fail, FISH results for that case should not be reported. If control slides fail to

meet the slide acceptance criteria, the Leica HER2 FISH System - 30 Test may have performed

inadequately. In this instance, a repeat test with fresh control slides and patient specimen

slide(s) will be required. If the results are outside of the specified range, but the control slides

meet the acceptance criteria for quality, repeat screening of the same slide may be appropriate

since the enumeration may not have been performed correctly. Consult the troubleshooting

guide (Table 6) in the event of hybridization failure, with either the specimen or control slide(s).
For clinical specimens, when interpretation of the hybridization signal is difficult and there is

insufficient specimen sample for re-assay, the test is uninformative. If there are insufficient cells

for analysis, the test is uninformative.
Patient specimens should be controlled according to standard laboratory operating procedures.

Signal quality and enumeration results should be documented on an appropriate report form.

Limitations

A. General Limitations

FISH is a technique that requires specialized training in all aspects of the procedure (including

the selection of appropriate reagents, tissue, fixation, processing and slide preparation) and

interpretation. Tissue staining is dependent on the handling, fixation and processing of the

tissue prior to staining. Improper fixation, freezing, thawing, washing, drying, heating, sectioning

or contamination with other tissues or fluids may produce morphological artifacts, nucleic acid

degradation, background fluorescence or false negative results. Inconsistent results may be

due to variations in fixation, embedding methods, or inherent irregularities within the tissue

(21). Excessive or incomplete counterstaining may also compromise correct interpretation of

the results.
Non-specific staining as a result of unbound probe has a scattered, granular appearance

and may be visualized at or distant from the expected hybridization site. Use intact cells for

interpretation of staining results. Necrotic or degenerated cells may stain non-specifically (22).

Advertising