Pantech DM P100 User Manual

Page 67

Advertising
background image

129

CH 5

FDA CONSUMER UPDATE

Lifetime animal exposure studies could be completed

in a few years. However, very large numbers of ani-

mals would be needed to provide reliable proof of a

cancer promoting effect if one exists. Epidemiological

studies can provide data that is directly applicable to

human populations, but 10 or more years’ follow-up

may be needed to provide answers about some health

effects, such as cancer. This is because the interval

between the time of exposure to a cancer- causing

agent and the time tumors develop - if they do -may

be many, many years. The interpretation of epidemio-

logical studies is hampered by difficulties in measur-

ing actual RF exposure during day-to-day use of wire-

less phones. Many factors affect this measurement,

such as the angle at which the phone is held, or which

model of phone is used.

6. What is FDA doing to find out more about the possi-

ble health effects of wireless phone RF?

FDA is working with the U.S. National Toxicology

Program and with groups of investigators around the

world to ensure that high priority animal studies are

conducted to address important questions about the

effects of exposure to radiofrequency energy (RF).

FDA has been a leading participant in the World Health

Organization International Electromagnetic Fields

(EMF) Project since its inception in 1996. An influen-

tial result of this work has been the development of a

detailed agenda of research needs that has driven the

establishment of new research pro-grams around the

world.

128

CH 5

FDA CONSUMER UPDATE

4. What are the results of the research done already?

The research done thus far has produced conflicting

results, and many studies have suffered from flaws in

their research methods. Animal experiments investi-

gating the effects of radiofrequency energy (RF) expo-

sures characteristic of wireless phones have yielded

conflicting results that often cannot be repeated in

other laboratories. A few animal studies, however,

have suggested that low levels of RF could accelerate

the development of cancer in laboratory animals.

However, many of the studies that showed increased

tumor development used animals that had been

genetically engineered or treated with cancer-causing

chemicals so as to be pre-disposed to develop cancer

in the absence of RF exposure. Other studies exposed

the animals to RF for up to 22 hours per day. These

conditions are not similar to the conditions under

which people use wireless phones, so we don’t know

with certainty what the results of such studies mean

for human health. Three large epidemiology studies

have been published since December 2000. Between

them, the studies investigated any possible associa-

tion between the use of wireless phones and primary

brain cancer, glioma, meningioma, or acoustic neu-

roma, tumors of the brain or salivary gland, leukemia,

or other cancers. None of the studies demonstrated

the existence of any harmful health effects from wire-

less phone RF exposures. However, none of the stud-

ies can answer questions about long-term exposures,

since the average period of phone use in these stud-

ies was around three years.

5. What research is needed to decide whether RF

exposure from wireless phones poses a health risk?

A combination of laboratory studies and epidemiologi-

cal studies of people actually using wireless phones

would provide some of the data that are needed.

Advertising