Effect of turbidity on chlorophyll readings, Limitations of, Measurements – Xylem 6-Series Multiparameter User Manual

Page 264

Advertising
background image

Principles of Operation

Section 5

YSI Incorporated

Environmental Monitoring Systems Manual

5-26

wiper that makes it ideal for unattended applications. The wiper can be activated in real-time during

discrete sampling operations or will function automatically just before each sample is taken during long

term unattended monitoring studies. The number of wiper movements and the frequency of the cleaning

cycle for the unattended mode can be set in the sonde software. Generally, one wiper movement is

sufficient for most environmental applications, but in media with particularly heavy fouling, additional

cleaning cycles may be necessary.


EFFECT OF TURBIDITY ON CHLOROPHYLL READINGS

As described above, the filters in front of the photodiode in the YSI 6025 chlorophyll probe prevent most of

the 470 nm light which is used to excite the chlorophyll molecules from reaching the detector after being

backscattered off of non-fluorescent particles (turbidity) in environmental water. However, the filter system

is not perfect and a minor interference on chlorophyll readings from suspended solids may result.

Laboratory experiments indicate that a suspension of typical soil measured with a YSI turbidity sensor will

have a turbidity interference characterized by a factor of about 0.03 µg/L per NTU. For example, the

turbidity of the water must be above 100 NTU to produce an apparent chlorophyll reading equal to 3 µg/L.

In very cloudy water, the user may wish to use the independently-determined turbidity value and the above

compensation factor to correct measured chlorophyll values using, for example, a spreadsheet.

LIMITATIONS OF

IN VIVO CHLOROPHYLL

MEASUREMENTS

As noted above, the measurement of chlorophyll from in vivo fluorescence measurements will always be

less reliable than determinations made on molecular chlorophyll that has been extracted from the cells

using the procedures described in Standard Methods. This section describes some of the known problems

with in vivo chlorophyll measurement.

INTERFERENCES FROM OTHER FLUORESCENT SPECIES: The analytical methods described in
Standard Methods

for chlorophyll involve disruption of the living organisms present in suspension,

followed by extraction of molecular chlorophyll into a homogeneous solution in an organic solvent.

Acidification of the extract helps to minimize the interferences caused by a number of other, non-

chlorophyll species. In addition, readings can be taken at various wavelengths on a spectrophotometer to

differentiate between the various forms of chlorophyll (a, b, c) and pheophytin a.

In contrast to this fairly controlled situation, all in vivo sensors operate under whole-cell, heterogeneous

conditions where the sensor will measure, at least to some degree, everything which fluoresces in the

region of the spectrum above 630 nm when irradiated with 470 nm light. Therefore, the sensor is really

quantifying overall fluorescence under these optical conditions, rather than chlorophyll specifically. While

it is probable that most of the fluorescence is due to suspended plant and algal matter and that much of the

fluorescence from this biomass is due to chlorophyll, it is impossible to exclude interferences from other

fluorescent species using the approach described above.

Note that in vivo fluorometers usually cannot differentiate between the different forms of chlorophyll.

LACK OF CALIBRATION REAGENTS: The usual reagents which are used for the calibration of

fluorometric measurements for chlorophyll after extraction into organic solvents are purchased as “purified

chlorophyll a” from chemical supply vendors such as Sigma. These standards are not soluble in aqueous

media and, even if they were, their fluorescence is unlikely to be the same as when the chlorophyll is

present in the whole living cell. Therefore, for even a semiquantitative calibration, the user needs a

“substitute” standard such as Rhodamine WT (see above) to provide a method for estimating the sensitivity

of the sensor. Field readings based on this type of calibration will provide only an estimate of chlorophyll

in environmental water where the measurement is taken on whole cell suspensions in vivo. The calibration

Advertising
This manual is related to the following products: