Metrohm tiamo 2.3 (process analysis) - Manual (Page 30)

1.10 What is new in tiamo 2.3? ￭￭￭￭￭￭￭￭￭￭￭￭￭￭￭￭￭￭￭￭￭￭
14 ￭￭￭￭￭￭￭￭ tiamo 2.3 (for Process Analysis)
￭ If one wished to edit a line in the sample data table (e.g., in order to
change a sample size) in situations where the method group was dif-
ferent from the one in the last line, then the method was replaced
automatically by the first method in the last method group.
￭ If a waiting time was specified in a KFC method as a start condition
(Pause) and if a determination series was started with the method,
then the time was depicted correctly in the live display only in the first
run-through. This had however no effect on the sequence.
￭ In the command START, Number or Date/Time was selected on the
tab Method variables for IDx as the type, while at the same time the
check box Check at start was also active. If the IDx fields were still
empty at the start of the determination, then the message 014-152
Field empty would appear after the start of the conditioning.
￭ Determinations with the command STAT pH with monitoring (action:
Wait for [Continue]) did not function correctly.
￭ The Round() function supplied incorrect results under certain condi-
tions.
Formula Result
Round( 1000 * 10 / 50 )/1000 0.00 wrong
(Round( 1000 * 10 / 50 )/1000) 0.20 right
￭ If the iConnect was disconnected during a measurement, then the
message Unhandled error would appear.
￭ If a method was comprised of several tracks with WAIT commands in
which one track called up the next with a command CALL, then this
sometimes led to deadlocks.
Program part Database
￭ The table was not displayed in the dialog window Reprocessing on
the tab Statistics (the error was rectified previously in tiamo 2.2 Patch
1).
￭ Problems sometimes arose in connection with titrations with condition-
ing in cases where more than one database was entered in the com-
mand DATABASE.
￭ If a track (e.g. which contained a command STAT pH) was run
through more than once, then all of the curves were displayed in the
database, even if the function Delete old data was activated.
￭ The break points found were not output in the database in the sub-
window Results on the tab Raw data with the command MEAS
Opt.
￭ The x smoothing was not applied on the y1 axis in the database with
the properties of the curve in the dialog window Curve evaluation.