2 encoder evaluation method, Encoder evaluation method, Encoder evaluation method ( 261) – Lenze 8400 User Manual

Page 261: 5motor control (mctrl)

Advertising
background image

Lenze · 8400 protec HighLine · Reference manual · DMS 3.0 EN · 03/2013 · TD05

261

5

Motor control (MCTRL)

5.11

Encoder/feedback system

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

5.11.2

Encoder evaluation method

Depending on the encoder used, the following table specifies which evaluation method should be

selected in

C00496

:

Tip!

• We recommend to use the preset combined encoder method (

C00496

= 2).

• Use one of the first three procedures (

C00496

= 0, 1, or 2) for dynamic applications (e.g.

operating mode: servo control).

• For dynamic speed control or positioning processes, use an HTL encoder with 1024

increments.

Selection in

C00496

Encoder evaluation method

0: High-resolution encoder

High-precision procedure for high-resolution encoders (>=512 increments)

• Method for speed measurement with automatic scan time setting

(0.5 … 500 ms).

• Evaluation with automatic scanning time minimisation for an optimum dynamic

performance.

• Particularly suited for high-resolution encoders (≥ 1024 inc) with good signal

quality, i.e.

• good scanning ratio 1:1

• exactly 90°-phase offset between track A and B (error ≤ ± 10°)

• Not suited for encoders with poor signal quality.

• Wiring according to EMC (e.g. motor and encoder cable shielding) is required!

1: Low-resolution encoder

(StateLine)

High-precision procedure for low-resolution encoders (<=128 increments)

• Exact method for speed measurement with automatic scanning time setting

(0.5 … 500 ms) for low-resolution encoders in the range of 4 …. 128 increments.

• Evaluation with automatic scanning time minimisation for an optimum dynamic

performance.

• Method is also suited for encoders with poor signal quality, e.g. for encoders with

high error rate in scanning ratio and phase offset.

• This method requires an equidistant period length per encoder increment.

• Wiring according to EMC (e.g. motor and encoder cable shielding) is required!

2: Comb. encoder method

(Lenze setting)

Combination of the first two procedures as a function of the speed (recommended

procedure)

• For a high-precision speed measurement suited for encoders with an arbitrary

number of increments (4 … 1024 increments).

• Low input frequencies at the encoder inputs:

The method is used for low-resolution encoders.

• High input frequencies at the encoder inputs:

The method is used for high-resolution encoders.

• This method is suited for encoders with average to good signal quality.

• Evaluation with automatic scanning time minimisation for an optimum dynamic

performance.

• This method requires an equidistant period length per encoder increment.

• Wiring according to EMC (e.g. motor and encoder cable shielding) is required!

3: Edge-counting procedure

Simple edge counting procedure with adjustable scanning time (

C00425

)

• Speed measurement by means of the edges of tracks A and B measured per

scanning interval.

• Integrated correction algorithm for EMC interference.

• Limited suitability for systems with unshielded encoder and/or motor cable.

• Limited suitability for encoders with poor signal quality, i.e. high error rate in

scanning ratio and phase offset.

Advertising